FundRaising Success

You will be automatically redirected to fundraisingsuccessmag in 20 seconds.
Skip this advertisement.

Advertisement
Advertisement
 
 

Ask the Experts: Vendor/Client Relationships

April 2008
1
A direct-mail provider in the Chicagoland area recently posed this question:

My company partners with many nonprofit organizations. Several of them annually ask us for donations back. We make it known that our policy is to review what we have done for organizations in December, and if a company wants us to make a donation they may [ask us], in writing, at that time. 

About six weeks ago, one of these nonprofits contacted us (via e-mail) asking if we would consider making a $1,500 donation to a special event they were having.

In spite of the fact that our policy of a written request in December was not followed, we decided to show good faith in the relationship we had with this nonprofit and sent a donation for $250. 

(As an aside, this organization’s policy is to pay its vendors in 90 to 120 days.)

The donation was met with the following response from the chief development officer/vice president of marketing: “The president of the Foundation is very disappointed in your level of commitment. It reflects poorly on me personally and my relationship with her and the Foundation. Your company was the Foundation’s largest vendor last year in terms of dollars spent. I know times are tight, but the success of the Foundation is dependent on the generosity of its friends and associates. Please re-look at your level of commitment. Thanks in advance for re-considering.” (I have condensed the remarks for time and space).

After re-considering, we decided that we financially could afford to give no more; we had given at a level at which we were comfortable. Upon receiving this information, this was the response from the nonprofit in question (again condensed): “As I know you are very well aware, we have alternatives in meeting our printing and mailing needs. These alternative vendors have given $1,000 to the Foundation. It appears as if all parties might be better off parting ways.”

I guess my question is, where do the standards of right and wrong fall here? Is it ethical, what was done and the way it was done?

Our experts respond:

This is an amazing story. I can’t but believe there may be more to it than meets the eye.

I have no quarrel with the nonprofit making the request on relatively short notice. Oftentimes, a special event is not planned far enough in advance to get the request in by a deadline.
 

Companies Mentioned:

1

MORE ON EXECUTIVE ISSUES/PERSONNEL/EDUCATION >>

FROM THE BOOKSTORE

(PDF Download)

Direct mail, email, mobile, social media, video, search ... the marketing landscape can either be a minefield where mistakes can kill campaigns, or a perfectly integrated mix of channels that maximizes the reach of the message and gives a nonprofit the best chance to capture more donor dollars.  

<b>In <i>"The Art & Science of Multichannel Fundraising" </i> from DirectMarketingIQ, the roadmap to that "perfectly integrated mix" is thoroughly laid out in over 130 pages -- <u>it's specifically created (and priced) for nonprofits</u>. </b>
  
First, 9 chapters from leading fundraisers give you the latest best practices in multichannel fundraising, including how to:  

• Choose the right channels for your campaign 
• Develop creative that works across multiple channels 
• Revitalize the direct mail component of your multichannel mix 
• Make sure email plays its increasingly important role perfectly 
• Seamlessly integrate mobile marketing into the fundraising campaign 
• Boost your online strategy with social media 
• Create a multichannel donor renewal campaign 
• Figure out that you're doing right — via testing and results measurement 
• Use all the pieces of the multichannel puzzle  

Second, in 8 robust case studies, find out the secrets behind multichannel fundraising campaigns that worked.

About DirectMarketingIQ
The Research Division of the Target Marketing Group, DirectMarketingIQ (www.directmarketingiq.com) is the marketers’ go-to resource. Publishing books, special reports, case studies and how-to-guides, it opens up a new world to those who seek more information, more ideas and more success stories in order to boost their own marketing efforts. DirectMarketingIQ has unparalleled access to direct marketing data – including the world’s most complete library of direct mail as well as a massive library of promotional emails across hundreds of categories – and producly produces content from the most experienced editors and practitioners in the industry.

<b>Note: You must have Adobe Acrobat Reader in order to read , The Art & Science of Multichannel Fundraising which is in PDF format.</b> The Art & Science of Multichannel Fundraising

(PDF Download) Direct mail, email, mobile, social media, video, search ... the marketing landscape can either be a minefield where mistakes can kill campaigns, or a perfectly integrated mix of channels that maximizes the reach of the message and gives a nonprofit the best chance to capture more donor dollars....

ORDER NOW

Your everything-you-need-to-know guide to personalized URLs, including: <b>Best Practices </b> on why they work, campaign strategy, multichannel creative, analytics, and <b>10 Case Studies</b> PURLs for Profit

Your everything-you-need-to-know guide to personalized URLs, including: Best Practices on why they work, campaign strategy, multichannel creative, analytics, and 10 Case Studies...

ORDER NOW

 

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments:
Jeff Dobkin - Posted on April 01, 2008
On the face of this, it sounds a lot like "pay for play." We in Philadelphia are especially familiar with this concept - and you only had to look at the ex-mayor's office to see this in action.
However, the number you didn't mention might come into play. If the vendor was churning out $400,000 worth of work a year the donation figure requested might have been more realistic; although what gall to ask for it, no matter how elegantly initially phrased. And talk about an ungrateful way to accept?
On second thought, "pay for play" sounds like it fits, no matter the amount. I know I look past the dollar figure from our own vendors. While bids must be competitive, value and service weigh in more heavily in our vendor equation.
Click here to view archived comments...
Archived Comments:
Jeff Dobkin - Posted on April 01, 2008
On the face of this, it sounds a lot like "pay for play." We in Philadelphia are especially familiar with this concept - and you only had to look at the ex-mayor's office to see this in action.
However, the number you didn't mention might come into play. If the vendor was churning out $400,000 worth of work a year the donation figure requested might have been more realistic; although what gall to ask for it, no matter how elegantly initially phrased. And talk about an ungrateful way to accept?
On second thought, "pay for play" sounds like it fits, no matter the amount. I know I look past the dollar figure from our own vendors. While bids must be competitive, value and service weigh in more heavily in our vendor equation.