FundRaising Success

You will be automatically redirected to fundraisingsuccessmag in 20 seconds.
Skip this advertisement.

Advertisement
Advertisement
 
 

Case Study: The Home for Little Wanderers

The Home for Little Wanderers reaches major donors with a highly personalized campaign that avoids a “direct mail” look.

May 2007 By Lynn Edmonds
2
Get the Flash Player to see this rotator.
 
Most larger nonprofit organizations have an aggressive major-donor program in place. Once a donor — whether connected with the organization via direct mail, the Internet, special events or other medium — reaches a certain giving level, the major-gifts folks take over and treat him very differently than other, lower-value donors. The contacts are more personal and focus on face-to-face solicitations.

But what of smaller organizations that can’t afford similar approaches? The challenge of securing major gifts is no less vital to them than to their larger counterparts.

In that case, major-donor solicitation through the mail is a terrific opportunity. It can be done, but it does have its challenges.

Here’s how Boston-based The Home for Little Wanderers, one of New England’s largest child-welfare agencies, instituted such a program.

Serving thousands of abused, neglected or at-risk children and their families each year, the organization works to ensure the healthy emotional and social development of children through an integrated system of residential group homes, special-education schools, adoption services, and counseling and advocacy programs.

The Home’s total annual operating budget is around $41 million; of that, only $4 million comes from its fundraising program and, of that, about $1.2 million is from direct mail.

Case in point
The Home relies heavily on major-donor support and was looking for ways to effectively cultivate these donors. Its development team had multiple sources for acquiring major donors and potential donors, including fundraising galas, an annual golf tournament, cultivation events and through its board of directors. Many of these supporters previously had given just one major gift of $1,000 or more, but most were not direct-mail donors. The organization also developed a list of prospects that had been identified as having the capacity and propensity to make gifts of $1,000 or more.

Demographically, this audience differed significantly from The Home’s usual direct-mail donors, who are women over 55 years old. By comparison, its major donors were males with higher incomes.

The Home’s development staffers knew that reaching out to their best donors and top prospects through the mail could be a cost-effective way to raise significant funds for new initiatives or special appeals. They decided to mail to them during the holiday season, including about 900 of the top-ranked donors and prospects in this mailing.

Objectives and challenges
The Home had several objectives for its Major Donor Holiday Campaign:
 

Companies Mentioned:

2

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments:
Lynn S. Edmonds - Posted on May 16, 2007
The Home?s donors have responded very well to this campaign for two years now, as I noted in the article. This is how we judge our campaigns. Donors tell us, through their response, what works and what doesn?t.

john friesen - Posted on May 08, 2007
You're joking. This has all the earmarks of a by-rote, mechanically produced mail campaign. I'll bet it wasn't even actually signed by the president -- which could easily be done with a mailing of only 900. The opening is standard DM tedium -- full of platitude and insincerity. A real writer would have filled the letter with the president's personality. And for god's sake, inject a little episode into the letter to replace those boring statistics. I can do a better fund raising effort in my sleep. How about opening with something like:

Nothing pains me more than my first meeting with a child who has been neglected or abused. But I'm also filled with hope because I know that child is safe now, in the loving and protecting arms of The Home....

Click here to view archived comments...
Archived Comments:
Lynn S. Edmonds - Posted on May 16, 2007
The Home?s donors have responded very well to this campaign for two years now, as I noted in the article. This is how we judge our campaigns. Donors tell us, through their response, what works and what doesn?t.

john friesen - Posted on May 08, 2007
You're joking. This has all the earmarks of a by-rote, mechanically produced mail campaign. I'll bet it wasn't even actually signed by the president -- which could easily be done with a mailing of only 900. The opening is standard DM tedium -- full of platitude and insincerity. A real writer would have filled the letter with the president's personality. And for god's sake, inject a little episode into the letter to replace those boring statistics. I can do a better fund raising effort in my sleep. How about opening with something like:

Nothing pains me more than my first meeting with a child who has been neglected or abused. But I'm also filled with hope because I know that child is safe now, in the loving and protecting arms of The Home....