FundRaising Success

You will be automatically redirected to fundraisingsuccessmag in 20 seconds.
Skip this advertisement.

Advertisement
Advertisement
 
 

Case Study: The Home for Little Wanderers

The Home for Little Wanderers reaches major donors with a highly personalized campaign that avoids a “direct mail” look.

May 2007 By Lynn Edmonds
2
Get the Flash Player to see this rotator.
 
  • Renew donors who had given $1,000 or more in the past.
  • Upgrade gifts from existing donors.
  • Convert prospects into direct-mail donors.
  • Offer a minimum ask of $1,000 to encourage recipients to be as generous as possible.
  • Create a campaign that was easy to execute and cost-effective to maximize net income.
The key challenges were that many of these donors had little prior giving history and were not direct-mail responsive. Also, asking them to give $1,000 — through the mail — was potentially risky. Would donors feel comfortable giving this way? And what about prospects who had never given at all? How would they respond?

The strategy
The Home created a high-end, branded mailing that looked like it was personally created by and sent from The Home’s president to increase its open and response rates.

An “Office of the President” overbrand on ivory linen, stationery-style paper was used throughout the piece. Every effort was made to avoid “direct mail” graphics, treatments or other clues that would make it look like a mass-produced package.

The outer envelope was closed-faced and used a First Class stamp for postage. A personalized, one-page letter from the president praised donors for their “outstanding generosity” and “extraordinary, heartfelt commitment” to The Home’s children, and asked them to “please consider making a special donation this holiday season.” Each letter was hand-signed to increase the intimacy of the correspondence.

The reply device, on a heavier card stock, was very simple, with no scan lines or other codes. The offer was stated simply, without a headline, and continued in the voice of the president, rather than the donor-voice copy that typically appears on reply slips.

The results
The response was outstanding. In the first year of this campaign, the response rate was more than 26 percent, with an average gift of more than $1,100 and gross revenue of more than $280,000. The cost per dollar raised was an incredible $0.01.

In the second year of the campaign, the response rate increased to more than 35 percent, despite a smaller target audience, with an average gift of more than $1,200 and similar gross revenue levels.

Direct-mail campaigns allow smaller nonprofits to reach out to many more major donors and high-value prospects than is practical by traditional face-to-face methods, at a much lower cost.

Major donors do have different needs and expectations compared to regular donors, and they also might be very different people in terms of age, gender and financial status. But they will support your organization through the mail, if treated appropriately.

A highly personalized, intimate approach will enhance response. Use closed-face envelopes and First Class postage, messaging that references the donor’s special giving level, and other subtle techniques that simulate true, personal correspondence. These are all simple, cost-effective tactics that even the smallest nonprofit organizations can implement in their fundraising programs.

Lynn S. Edmonds is president of L.W. Robbins Associates. She can be reached at ledmonds@lwra.com.

 

Companies Mentioned:

2

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments:
Lynn S. Edmonds - Posted on May 16, 2007
The Home?s donors have responded very well to this campaign for two years now, as I noted in the article. This is how we judge our campaigns. Donors tell us, through their response, what works and what doesn?t.

john friesen - Posted on May 08, 2007
You're joking. This has all the earmarks of a by-rote, mechanically produced mail campaign. I'll bet it wasn't even actually signed by the president -- which could easily be done with a mailing of only 900. The opening is standard DM tedium -- full of platitude and insincerity. A real writer would have filled the letter with the president's personality. And for god's sake, inject a little episode into the letter to replace those boring statistics. I can do a better fund raising effort in my sleep. How about opening with something like:

Nothing pains me more than my first meeting with a child who has been neglected or abused. But I'm also filled with hope because I know that child is safe now, in the loving and protecting arms of The Home....

Click here to view archived comments...
Archived Comments:
Lynn S. Edmonds - Posted on May 16, 2007
The Home?s donors have responded very well to this campaign for two years now, as I noted in the article. This is how we judge our campaigns. Donors tell us, through their response, what works and what doesn?t.

john friesen - Posted on May 08, 2007
You're joking. This has all the earmarks of a by-rote, mechanically produced mail campaign. I'll bet it wasn't even actually signed by the president -- which could easily be done with a mailing of only 900. The opening is standard DM tedium -- full of platitude and insincerity. A real writer would have filled the letter with the president's personality. And for god's sake, inject a little episode into the letter to replace those boring statistics. I can do a better fund raising effort in my sleep. How about opening with something like:

Nothing pains me more than my first meeting with a child who has been neglected or abused. But I'm also filled with hope because I know that child is safe now, in the loving and protecting arms of The Home....