Open Enrollment | Subscribe to NonProfit PRO HERE
Connect
Follow us on
Advertisement
 

Dig Deeper When Examining Fundraising Results

January 9, 2013 By Jeff Jowdy
Get the Flash Player to see this rotator.
 
I was surprised last week when I saw postings of a Chronicle of Philanthropy article headlined "America's Wealthiest Donors Slow Their Giving." It seemed to indicate a trend.

When I dug deeper and read the article, I found it was actually based on a listing of the gifts that billionaires publicly announced in 2012.

Digging further still, it read, "Thirteen of the commitments in 2012 were for $100 million or more (counting Mr. Buffett's), three more than in 2011 and seven more than in 2010." So, actually the headline could have read "$100 Million Gifts Increase in 2012."  And, it noted that three of the $100 million gifts had been announced in December and "that could be a positive sign for 2013." How this was determined was not clear.

Just reading the headline could draw one conclusion, but a more thorough read could draw a totally different conclusion — and the article doesn't account for any anonymous gifts (some of which are publicized and some not).     

During the 2008 presidential election cycle, I received an e-mail from a trusted friend citing a candidate's record on an issue. While the content surprised me, the forward cited an article in The Wall Street Journal — and even had the newspaper's masthead and the date it was published. Curious, I dug deeper — and there was no such article to be found.

When I was a young CEO, I recall meeting with staff on fundraising events and blindly accepting the report that our events were going well. I felt that if they said so, surely it was a fact. After the first round of events, the actual results came in and some of the reports of events doing well were justified, and many were not. I learned then to dig deeper and ask specifics about the status of a project!

In major campaigns we hear from time to time that "they" are not happy with the campaign for some reason. When you begin to dig to find out who "they" are, it is often just one person who has expressed a concern. And usually, that one person isn't really relevant to the campaign's outcome.  

 

Companies Mentioned:

SPONSORED CONTENT

MORE ON DATABASE / DONOR RELATIONSHIP >>

FROM THE BOOKSTORE

Written by Millennials about Millennials, Cause for Change: Examines how Millennials communicate, volunteer, take action, influence their peers, and choose to give their time and moneyExplains how Millennials view their role in the workplace, and how their approach is re-shaping nonprofit culture from within Cause for Change: The Why and How of Nonprofit Millennial Engagement

Written by Millennials about Millennials, Cause for Change:
Examines how Millennials communicate, volunteer, take action, influence their peers, and choose to give their time and moneyExplains how Millennials view their role in the workplace, and how their approach is re-shaping nonprofit culture from within...

ORDER NOW

Reading The Ultimate  Insider’s Guide to Winning Foundation Grants is like peeking at someone’s  secret diary or personal email.  You feel  guilty.  This is privileged information.
Only in this case Martin Teitel WANTS to reveal everything  to you. A
 long-time foundation CEO, he’s fed up with the smoke and mirrors of  
grant seeking. Ultimate Insider's Guide to Winning Foundation Grants

Reading The Ultimate Insider’s Guide to Winning Foundation Grants is like peeking at someone’s secret diary or personal email. You feel guilty. This is privileged information. Only in this case Martin Teitel WANTS to reveal everything to you. A long-time foundation CEO, he’s fed up with the smoke and mirrors of...

ORDER NOW

 

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments: