FundRaising Success

You will be automatically redirected to fundraisingsuccessmag in 20 seconds.
Skip this advertisement.

Advertisement
Advertisement
 
 

The Futility of Educating Donors

Education is good for everyone — but so is cod-liver oil.

September 2008 By Jeff Brooks
1
Get the Flash Player to see this rotator.
 
This fall, I’m starting 10th grade. It’s my third time. Sadly, only the first time through was recorded on my own transcript — I’m doing a lot better at high school than I did when I was in high school. These recent runs at 10th grade are as a shadow to my kids. You see, I’m kind of into education. It’s important. And it’s cool. It’s even fun, at times.

But there’s one kind of education I’m wary of: educating donors.

A lot of nonprofits put tons of energy into educating their donors. They make it a priority right next to raising funds.

For the most part, educating donors is a futile and money-wasting exercise. Not only does it squander resources and opportunities — but it nearly always fails to educate.

Here’s why it doesn’t work
I see two reasons educating donors is such a losing proposition:

1. Most folks don’t really want to be educated. Let me clarify that: Pretty much everybody would rather eat a bug than have more facts crammed into their heads.

I know this because I used to be a teacher.

I thought I was a pretty good teacher, but one thing always deflated me: The coolest, most popular thing I could do for my students — something that would literally make them break out into applause — was to cancel a class. To tell them, in effect, “Tomorrow, you won’t get your education — the thing you’ve dedicated this period of your life to and that’s costing you (well, someone) a pile of money.”

Can you think of any other business (other than death-and-dismemberment insurance) from which people so earnestly don’t want their money’s worth?

It’s not just college students, either. Most people, most of the time, actively avoid being educated.

I don’t want to give you the impression that people in general are dull-witted, Philistine troglodytes with no intellectual curiosity or interest in the world around them.

Far from it. Nearly everyone has a set of interests that they know a lot about, pursue with passion and give meaningful effort to educate themselves about.

In my own circle of friends, there are people who are uncommonly educated about Thai cooking, church vestments, 19th-century string quartets, stadium architecture and the history of golf. For reasons I don’t fully understand, I’m a sucker for geographic curiosities. (There’s an enclave of India that’s inside an enclave of Bangladesh that’s inside an enclave of India that’s inside Bangladesh. That is just super cool, as far as I’m concerned.)
 

Companies Mentioned:

1

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments:
Bill - Posted on September 15, 2008
YES! Got it in one!

My profession (accounting) makes this mistake over and over - trying to teach people about accounting, when really we should just help them to get through financial statements. You don't teach someone to drive by taking apart a motor. You don't get someone excited about your cause by telling them all the details about your charitable program.

Just focus on the results. If they ask you how you achieved them, then that's your invitation to teach.

Only once in my checkered career has a non-financial person been interested in how I calculated the financial statements. He was the president and had actually taken a month's worth of customer invoices and added them up. We had a great discussion about why we defer income recognition. (I'll stop the technical explanation right there!) Had he not been curious though, it would have been pointless for me to ask "want to know how we calculate the company's income?"

Thanks for a great post.

Bill
Click here to view archived comments...
Archived Comments:
Bill - Posted on September 15, 2008
YES! Got it in one!

My profession (accounting) makes this mistake over and over - trying to teach people about accounting, when really we should just help them to get through financial statements. You don't teach someone to drive by taking apart a motor. You don't get someone excited about your cause by telling them all the details about your charitable program.

Just focus on the results. If they ask you how you achieved them, then that's your invitation to teach.

Only once in my checkered career has a non-financial person been interested in how I calculated the financial statements. He was the president and had actually taken a month's worth of customer invoices and added them up. We had a great discussion about why we defer income recognition. (I'll stop the technical explanation right there!) Had he not been curious though, it would have been pointless for me to ask "want to know how we calculate the company's income?"

Thanks for a great post.

Bill