FundRaising Success

You will be automatically redirected to fundraisingsuccessmag in 20 seconds.
Skip this advertisement.

Advertisement
Advertisement
 
 

Easier Said than Done: Fundraising in the Age of Cynicism

Here's what you can do to win donors' hearts in today's tough climate.

December 2009 By Jeff Brooks
1
Get the Flash Player to see this rotator.
 

And watchdogs aren't the only source of credentials that can help donors trust you. Other types include:

• Endorsements from respected celebrities. (Careful: The wrong celebrity can do more harm than good.)

• Endorsements from other organizations.

• Ratings or reviews from trusted publications or sites.

Let donors speak for you
People trust other people more than they trust organizations and institutions. Study after study shows that most people make buying decisions only after reading user reviews. It's this social proof that helps overcome distrust of sellers, who, after all, have no interest in giving unbiased views of what they sell.

It's becoming the same with charity. Donors will look for social proof that it is what it says it is. Give donors a voice in your fundraising. This is easiest to do online, but even in noninteractive media, you can have donors talking, sharing their good experiences and why they give.

Be open about your finances and governance
Freely sharing information says a lot to donors about your trustworthiness. Make it easy for them to see your financial statement, annual report and IRS 990 forms. Post them, and publicize where they can be found.

Better yet, go beyond just posting general financial information. Make it clear to donors how you intend to spend the money they send you. What's the cost breakdown of this offer? Why is it so cheap (or expensive)? How much goes to overhead? Pie charts make it easy.

The fact that you share the information is the ?important thing. Don't be discouraged if "nobody's reading it." For many donors, probably most, its availability is more important than what it actually says.

Use the Donor Bill of Rights
Unless your organization is a little bit skeevy or a lot out-?of-date, you already adhere to this excellent and important document from the Association of Fundraising Professionals. Google it; you'll find it. Post the Donor Bill of Rights online and what it means specifically for donors. ?Or create a special version for your particular donors.

Ignore your lawyers
If you must have disclaimers, write them in plain English, not in the obfuscatory jargon of lawyers. Legal-speak is inherently hostile and feels untrustworthy. Don't cover your butt at the cost of coming across as evil.

The battle for a donor's trust isn't over once you have a gift in your hand. It continues as long as the relationship does. So make sure you keep doing all the above things, plus handle those who give with complete respect.

Do receipts right
A good receipt is about the same topic as the message that motivated the gift. Typical nonprofit receipts are generic and don't connect to the gift. Getting a receipt like that is like talking to someone with multiple personalities.

A receipt should use the same language, with the same level of emotion and urgency, that motivated the response. That makes it clear the need was, indeed, real, and it reinforces the donor's decision to give.

And while you're making those receipts relevant, send them out quickly. Nothing says "sloppy, disengaged, possibly fraudulent organization" like a receipt that takes weeks to arrive. If you don't have your receipting down to 24-hour turnaround, you aren't where you need to be.

Open the doors with a donor newsletter
You do have a newsletter, don't you? It's the one type of communication donors actually want from you.

A good newsletter is about donors and the impact of their giving. Secondary content can be about other opportunities to get involved. Don't send a newsletter that's about how efficient, cutting-edge, famous and cool you are. None of that matters. The donor is the story.

A newsletter isn't the only way to report back. Consider special progress reports about ongoing projects they support. Surprise donors with information about their impact. Lavish them with thanks and updates.

These things give evidence that your work is real, that the donor hasn't been tricked. They show her that her support matters and is appreciated.

That's how you fight cynicism. You'll know it's working when you see better donor retention, more upgrading and great word-of-mouth in the marketplace.

Jeff Brooks ?is creative director at TrueSense Marketing (truesense.com) and keeper of the Future Fundraising Now blog (futurefundraising?now.com). Reach him at ?jeff.brooks@truesense.com
 


 
1

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments:
Matt Bregman - Posted on December 13, 2009
That's great, Jeff. Succinct and clear.

One question though: why do you say the newsletter should be all about the donor?

I tend to think we nonprofits make the mistake of confusing ourselves with the people we serve. We shouldn't tell stories about how much people love us or focus on what huge numbers we've achieved, etc. Rather we should keep the focus on the people who benefit from what we do. And the same is true when it's time to talk about needs.

So I agree completely that we should remember that the donor is the audience for a donor newsletter, and we should cover what they are interested in -- and not what we'd like them to be interested in.

But how literal are you being when you say "the donor is the story"?
Click here to view archived comments...
Archived Comments:
Matt Bregman - Posted on December 13, 2009
That's great, Jeff. Succinct and clear.

One question though: why do you say the newsletter should be all about the donor?

I tend to think we nonprofits make the mistake of confusing ourselves with the people we serve. We shouldn't tell stories about how much people love us or focus on what huge numbers we've achieved, etc. Rather we should keep the focus on the people who benefit from what we do. And the same is true when it's time to talk about needs.

So I agree completely that we should remember that the donor is the audience for a donor newsletter, and we should cover what they are interested in -- and not what we'd like them to be interested in.

But how literal are you being when you say "the donor is the story"?