FundRaising Success

You will be automatically redirected to fundraisingsuccessmag in 20 seconds.
Skip this advertisement.

Advertisement
Advertisement
 
 

Getting Board Members to Give

April 13, 2010 By June Bradham
1
My perspective on boards is unique both in its optimism and its frustration. As a for-profit consultant helping nonprofits create a great experience for their board members, I see the tremendous opportunities if a few important pieces are brought into alignment. But as a nonprofit board member myself, I am often left unsatisfied by my experience, lose my passion and  find my eyes wandering to another board on which I could do more good - and have more fun.

Over the last few years, my firm has conducted best practices research about what factors lead to success in fundraising. Any guess what the No. 1 indicator is? How much the governing board gives.

If this is the case - and we've found it to be so across the board, regardless of industry - then why don't we do more to create the best possible environment in which boards can work? Why are we forever asking, "What can my board do for me?" instead of, "What can I do with my board?"

This question led me to a second round of research in which I interviewed high-value board members from around the world. Where our best practices collected data, this research effort collected experiences, and remarkably, both studies found the same thing: an engaged, happy board gives more. Combining the results from both led me to discover the nine truths about what nonprofit board members really want from their experience.

Board members want:

1. Stellar board makeup
They want to like and respect those with whom they serve. They want to feel comfortable but challenged, part of a team yet surrounded by people they admire.

2. Passion for the cause
While who else serves on the board was noted more often than any other driver, a close second was passion. And, while passion can certainly grow over time, recruiting someone to the board with name and network but no passion all but guarantees an empty seat.

3. The right CEO or ED
Those interviewed had so much to say about this important piece of the puzzle. The "right" CEO/executive director means something different to every organization, but this person must always be vocal and visible, dedicated to the cause, articulate in his or her presentation of mission, and available - as a partner and a friend - to the board. If not, there is no chance for harmony and little chance for success in fundraising.
 

Companies Mentioned:

1

MORE ON EXECUTIVE ISSUES/PERSONNEL/EDUCATION >>

FROM THE BOOKSTORE

As Tom Ahern makes clear in his new book, Seeing through a Donor’s Eyes, a case isn’t some fancy argument you only develop for capital campaigns, when you're chasing millions.You'll learn how to make a persuasive case for everything: • From your Annual Drive • To your Planned Giving Program • To your Capital Campaign  Seeing through a Donor's Eyes

As Tom Ahern makes clear in his new book, Seeing through a Donor’s Eyes, a case isn’t some fancy argument you only develop for capital campaigns, when you're chasing millions.

You'll learn how to make a persuasive case for everything:

• From your Annual Drive
• To your...

ORDER NOW

“Design & Formats for Boosting Direct Mail Response” is dedicated to helping you get people in the door… or prospects into your mail piece. No matter how great your data, your campaign strategy or even your copywriting, if the design doesn’t work, then your latest mailing will flop.Full of best practices from designers and copywriters
for increasing response with design, color, typography,
formats and components Design & Formats for Boosting Direct Mail Response

“Design & Formats for Boosting Direct Mail Response” is dedicated to helping you get people in the door… or prospects into your mail piece. No matter how great your data, your campaign strategy or even your copywriting, if the design doesn’t work, then your latest mailing will flop.Full of best...

ORDER NOW

 

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments:
wm earhart - Posted on April 13, 2010
I think the notion of having your board members give is ineffective in getting the type of board you really want. To suggest that if they have more skin in the game creates a better board is just not good research findings. Many people refuse to be on boards for that exact reasoning. If the ED can not find better methods of raising funds besides pressure on the Board then the ED needs to go. The time, service and experience of a particular board member should be enough. The ED needs to treat the operation like a business instead of an old fashion non profit. What can you do for the board? Stay out of their wallets.
Click here to view archived comments...
Archived Comments:
wm earhart - Posted on April 13, 2010
I think the notion of having your board members give is ineffective in getting the type of board you really want. To suggest that if they have more skin in the game creates a better board is just not good research findings. Many people refuse to be on boards for that exact reasoning. If the ED can not find better methods of raising funds besides pressure on the Board then the ED needs to go. The time, service and experience of a particular board member should be enough. The ED needs to treat the operation like a business instead of an old fashion non profit. What can you do for the board? Stay out of their wallets.