FundRaising Success

You will be automatically redirected to fundraisingsuccessmag in 20 seconds.
Skip this advertisement.

Advertisement
Advertisement
 
 

Young Donors and Other Mythical Creatures

If you want to raise funds, aim your sights at the elderly.

May 2010
7
Get the Flash Player to see this rotator.
 

Please don't be insulted when I tell you this: You are a statistical anomaly. So anomalous that it probably makes your thinking a little weird.

I'm making two assumptions about you when I say that:

1. You are younger than 65. (If you're older, please be patient while I address these young whipper- snappers. Thank you.)

2. You are a regular donor to charitable causes. (If you aren't, stop reading right now and go make some gifts. Yes, now. Either that or find work in an industry you're willing to participate in.)

If I'm right about these two things, you are an outlier, a curiosity, a freak — a young donor.

That's right — even if you're in your 40s or 50s, you are a rare young donor. (Enjoy this last chance of being thought of as a young anything!) If you're under 40, well, statistically you don't quite exist. Charitable giving is almost entirely dominated by older people. It's their territory, the way pop music belongs to young people.

If you have a sense that there are lots and lots of young donors, it's an illusion — caused by the fact that you are one and you know many others. Thing is, you aren't a tree in the midst of a great forest. You're in a tiny copse in the middle of a vast, treeless plain. The forest is where the old people are.

To hear some fundraisers talk, you'd think this was a terrible state of affairs. "We've got to get more young donors," they cry, with startling intensity.

I think a lot of fundraisers are focused on young donors for two reasons:

1. They're following the strategies of advertisers. For a lot of advertisers, young people are the holy grail. They spend a lot of money on clothing, entertainment and other profitable things. If you're selling jeans or video games, young people are where it's at. If you want people to hand you money for your cause — nope.

2. The fundraisers themselves are young, and they're sick of the old-fashioned ways of communicating that motivate older donors. Wouldn't it be cooler to talk to cooler people? Let's face it: It takes a real act of the imagination to get into the head of someone older than you. It's even harder when you're impressed with your own hipness and think the oldsters just don't get it.

 

Companies Mentioned:

7

SPONSORED CONTENT

MORE ON DATABASE / DONOR RELATIONSHIP >>

FROM THE BOOKSTORE

<I>Hitting the Email Inbox</I> covers all the bases of email deliverability, including everything from the very basics, to reputation management, as well as coding and design, and the connections between email deliverability and ROI. <BR><BR>As any good email marketer today knows, there are a number of obstacles standing between you and your prospect’s inbox. With anti-spam technology becoming more and more powerful and prospects being blitzed by rapidly increasing email volume, an email marketer’s concern isn’t just open rate anymore; it’s getting the email successfully delivered in the first place. <BR><BR><EM>Hitting the Email Inbox</EM>: Protect your sender rep, clean up your e-list and improve design to add dollars to your email marketing ROI features five chapters full of industry-proven best practices to achieve maximum inbox delivery. <BR><BR>You’ll also get dozens of surefire tips and methods for improving your deliverability, including: <BR>• Developing a trigger email program <BR>• Segmenting and reviewing your results by service <BR>• Understanding the whitelist/blacklist process <BR>• Using different addresses for different segments of your file <BR>• Not falling into the whole openers/non-openers/clickers trap <BR>• Test mailing at different times of the day <BR>• Being smart about timing <BR>• Use an ECOA service <BR>• Looking into certification, and much more! <BR><BR>The report also includes four detailed case studies, providing practical examples of what email deliverability tactics did and didn’t work for four real-life companies. Hitting the Email Inbox

Hitting the Email Inbox covers all the bases of email deliverability, including everything from the very basics, to reputation management, as well as coding and design, and the connections between email deliverability and ROI.

As any good email marketer today knows, there are a number of obstacles standing between you

...

ORDER NOW

Available as a PDF.<BR> <BR>A guide to prospecting, lead generation, building an Opt-in database, tracking, social media integration, deliverability, mining content and balanced creative. While email marketing has reached maturity, there’s still plenty of life in this channel — if used wisely. <BR><BR>That’s the focus of this new guide to email marketing, with articles devoted to best practices for prospecting; continuing to build and refresh your opt-in file; how social and email work together; generating relevant content; keeping your messages safe from spam filters and junk-mail folders; and more. <BR><BR>Are you searching for ways to create stronger email marketing campaigns? <BR><BR>The DirectMarketingIQ and Target Marketing editorial teams have been researching, writing and collecting expert advice from industry leaders about how to create top-notch email marketing campaigns for years. <BR><BR>We’ve compiled this information and made it easy for you to find all in one place, with our easy-to-read report – <EM>Email Marketing That Works (2nd Edition)</EM>. Email Marketing that Works (2nd Edition)

Available as a PDF.

A guide to prospecting, lead generation, building an Opt-in database, tracking, social media integration, deliverability, mining content and balanced creative. While email marketing has reached maturity, there’s still plenty of life in this channel — if used wisely.

That’s the focus of this new guide to email



...

ORDER NOW

 

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments:
Jeff Brooks - Posted on July 24, 2010
Older people utterly dominant the ranks donors of nearly all nonprofits. The Target Analytics Nonprofit Cooperative Database, which contains millions of donors to hundreds of US nonprofits, breaks down like this:

4% under age 35
11% 35-44
17% 45-54
22% 55-64
46% 65+

People above age 65 are nearly three times more likely to give than the US average -- and about 14 times as likely to give as those under 35. They also give significantly higher percentages of their income than younger people.

I say all this as a fundraiser, not as a social critic. I'm not saying, nor should anyone else conclude, that these facts show that there's something wrong with younger people. They will eventually become donors when their brain chemistry and other factors prompt them to do so. Criticizing the young for not being big donors is like criticizing infants for their lack of verbal ability. It's churlish and pointless.

The main point here is that spending your fundraising dollars trying to get young people to give is usually wasteful and irresponsible. It's pointlessly swimming upstream. (There are exceptions, but they are rare.)

My hat is off to all younger people who overcome the demographics and are donors despite their youth. You are doing significant good for yourself and for the world.

And if anyone younger wants my advice (I know, you really don't), I'd tell you to give. Give as much as you can. If your income is low, give a small amount. But give.
Nicolas - Posted on July 20, 2010
Devan,
All good points; however, I'd suggest that EVERY subculture has been seen in that way...Gen X doesn't care, Yuppies only care about themselves, Hippies are clueless and anti-establishment, and greasers are hoodlums. Throughout the decades, all those generations have shone their imapact in philanthropy. Are Hipsters any different. I suppose we will wait and see.
Nicolas
Devan - Posted on July 15, 2010
I 'm going to respectfully disagree with the comments from the two Gen Y'ers (M and N) who challenge the authors assertions.

I'm 27, and I too have a lot of friends my age who are engaged, and give money and even their entire careers to a good cause. Its great to see our friends and colleagues stepping up at such a young age and I really do think this bodes well for when our generation gets older.

However Nicholas and Mazarine are missing the point. You really are in that small copse - you might be surrounded by trees, but the total size of the forest is very small and doesn't match the landscape. It's so small that if you're looking at that generation as a source of revenue, you are wasting your time. Just because you are surrounded by friends that mimic a certain behavior doesn't mean that the rest of the world behaves like your social circle. Thats like living in Wasilla, AK and thinking that everyone likes to hunt wolves out of a chopper.

Kudos to the author for nailing this article - especially when he says, "Don't market to yourself. If your yardstick for good work is 'I'd respond to that,' you're getting it wrong for sure."

That doesn't mean you shouldn't engage or invest resources in getting our generation jazzed about your cause. You can target the right media outlets and ramp up your social media. We can get gen Y'ers and Millennials sold on our brand now and then milk them for cash when they start giving - which will probably be through direct mail...
Leonard Coyne - Posted on June 19, 2010
I would be interested to know on what basis these assertions are made? Are their studies or other empirical data supporting these conclusions? If so can they be referenced?
Nicolas - Posted on May 24, 2010
I am 28 and have worked with donors ages 25-45 for years as I’ve worked for NPOs surrounding early childhood education. I respectfully disagree with you assessment on young donors. We do give time and money. We do care and are committed to causes around the world. I have found that most experienced development professionals were raised as professionals decades ago and are not comfortable with the tools of accessibility that my generation relies. Gens X and Y are not inaccessible beacuse some fundraisers have not learned to reach them.

I know this kind of intergenerational disrespect and fear is common, but if you do not invest in us now, what makes you think that we will invest in you in years to come?

It disturbs me how some professionals speak to the up-and -coming generation...would it be appropriate to speak of any other potential donor in that manner?

To use the reverse example: would this article ever been written about the older generation who has not worked since email existed? My guess is no...You would pick up the phone to call. Yet, when asked for money from NPOs we get paper letters in the post.

The only way to activate a donor is to meet them where they want to be met.

Get out of your comfort zone. Give us the same courtisy that you'd give any other donors... which includes respect.
marjorie fine - Posted on May 19, 2010
Great article. But so is the comment about a livng wage. now what is your comment.? and does this apply to all donors, inheriters? made their money types? high end or regular givers? please go more into depth. thanks.
Mazarine - Posted on May 18, 2010
I do love and cherish my conversations with people over 40. And they do have different perspectives.

But perhaps you're going to have to face that Gen Y and Gen X are not as easily pigeonholed as all that.

What about asking a few young people if they give to nonprofits?

I do feel this is a citation needed moment.

Many people that I know give their time and money. Young and old. If they aren't giving in larger numbers, it's because their pay scale hasn't changed since the 1970s. Which means they don't have the disposable income that the boomers had or have. We have hollowed out the middle class from the inside and these children, teens and young adults are a product of that.

The next time you point the finger at younger donors and demand that they give, perhaps first you should demand that they be paid a living wage.

And why devalue volunteer hours? Each volunteer hour, on average, saves a nonprofit $18!

Mazarine
http://wildwomanfundraising.com
Click here to view archived comments...
Archived Comments:
Jeff Brooks - Posted on July 24, 2010
Older people utterly dominant the ranks donors of nearly all nonprofits. The Target Analytics Nonprofit Cooperative Database, which contains millions of donors to hundreds of US nonprofits, breaks down like this:

4% under age 35
11% 35-44
17% 45-54
22% 55-64
46% 65+

People above age 65 are nearly three times more likely to give than the US average -- and about 14 times as likely to give as those under 35. They also give significantly higher percentages of their income than younger people.

I say all this as a fundraiser, not as a social critic. I'm not saying, nor should anyone else conclude, that these facts show that there's something wrong with younger people. They will eventually become donors when their brain chemistry and other factors prompt them to do so. Criticizing the young for not being big donors is like criticizing infants for their lack of verbal ability. It's churlish and pointless.

The main point here is that spending your fundraising dollars trying to get young people to give is usually wasteful and irresponsible. It's pointlessly swimming upstream. (There are exceptions, but they are rare.)

My hat is off to all younger people who overcome the demographics and are donors despite their youth. You are doing significant good for yourself and for the world.

And if anyone younger wants my advice (I know, you really don't), I'd tell you to give. Give as much as you can. If your income is low, give a small amount. But give.
Nicolas - Posted on July 20, 2010
Devan,
All good points; however, I'd suggest that EVERY subculture has been seen in that way...Gen X doesn't care, Yuppies only care about themselves, Hippies are clueless and anti-establishment, and greasers are hoodlums. Throughout the decades, all those generations have shone their imapact in philanthropy. Are Hipsters any different. I suppose we will wait and see.
Nicolas
Devan - Posted on July 15, 2010
I 'm going to respectfully disagree with the comments from the two Gen Y'ers (M and N) who challenge the authors assertions.

I'm 27, and I too have a lot of friends my age who are engaged, and give money and even their entire careers to a good cause. Its great to see our friends and colleagues stepping up at such a young age and I really do think this bodes well for when our generation gets older.

However Nicholas and Mazarine are missing the point. You really are in that small copse - you might be surrounded by trees, but the total size of the forest is very small and doesn't match the landscape. It's so small that if you're looking at that generation as a source of revenue, you are wasting your time. Just because you are surrounded by friends that mimic a certain behavior doesn't mean that the rest of the world behaves like your social circle. Thats like living in Wasilla, AK and thinking that everyone likes to hunt wolves out of a chopper.

Kudos to the author for nailing this article - especially when he says, "Don't market to yourself. If your yardstick for good work is 'I'd respond to that,' you're getting it wrong for sure."

That doesn't mean you shouldn't engage or invest resources in getting our generation jazzed about your cause. You can target the right media outlets and ramp up your social media. We can get gen Y'ers and Millennials sold on our brand now and then milk them for cash when they start giving - which will probably be through direct mail...
Leonard Coyne - Posted on June 19, 2010
I would be interested to know on what basis these assertions are made? Are their studies or other empirical data supporting these conclusions? If so can they be referenced?
Nicolas - Posted on May 24, 2010
I am 28 and have worked with donors ages 25-45 for years as I’ve worked for NPOs surrounding early childhood education. I respectfully disagree with you assessment on young donors. We do give time and money. We do care and are committed to causes around the world. I have found that most experienced development professionals were raised as professionals decades ago and are not comfortable with the tools of accessibility that my generation relies. Gens X and Y are not inaccessible beacuse some fundraisers have not learned to reach them.

I know this kind of intergenerational disrespect and fear is common, but if you do not invest in us now, what makes you think that we will invest in you in years to come?

It disturbs me how some professionals speak to the up-and -coming generation...would it be appropriate to speak of any other potential donor in that manner?

To use the reverse example: would this article ever been written about the older generation who has not worked since email existed? My guess is no...You would pick up the phone to call. Yet, when asked for money from NPOs we get paper letters in the post.

The only way to activate a donor is to meet them where they want to be met.

Get out of your comfort zone. Give us the same courtisy that you'd give any other donors... which includes respect.
marjorie fine - Posted on May 19, 2010
Great article. But so is the comment about a livng wage. now what is your comment.? and does this apply to all donors, inheriters? made their money types? high end or regular givers? please go more into depth. thanks.
Mazarine - Posted on May 18, 2010
I do love and cherish my conversations with people over 40. And they do have different perspectives.

But perhaps you're going to have to face that Gen Y and Gen X are not as easily pigeonholed as all that.

What about asking a few young people if they give to nonprofits?

I do feel this is a citation needed moment.

Many people that I know give their time and money. Young and old. If they aren't giving in larger numbers, it's because their pay scale hasn't changed since the 1970s. Which means they don't have the disposable income that the boomers had or have. We have hollowed out the middle class from the inside and these children, teens and young adults are a product of that.

The next time you point the finger at younger donors and demand that they give, perhaps first you should demand that they be paid a living wage.

And why devalue volunteer hours? Each volunteer hour, on average, saves a nonprofit $18!

Mazarine
http://wildwomanfundraising.com