FundRaising Success

You will be automatically redirected to fundraisingsuccessmag in 20 seconds.
Skip this advertisement.

Advertisement
Advertisement
 
 

Are You Teasing Me?

June 16, 2011 By Pamela Barden
4

A lot of fundraising writers have it all wrong (in my opinion). They work for hours to develop copy that reads well, tells a great story, has a clear ask, and compels the recipient to open up the wallet and respond. The reply form is easy to use, and the insert advances the case to give.

But it isn’t until the last minute that they write the envelope teaser — that often-maligned “sales” copy printed on the front of the envelope. (For nonprofits using e-mail appeals, the subject line is the equivalent of the teaser.)

Let’s think like a donor for a minute. He or she sees your envelope first — and maybe last. If there is nothing that captures attention, you’re sunk. No matter what is in the envelope, your potential donor won’t see it. Your brilliant letter and award-winning photography has just been consigned to the recycling bin or trash can. Ditto on the e-appeal. If the subject line isn’t appealing, the e-mail is deleted. Worse, if the subject line is offensive or just boring, you could be eternally relegated to “junk sender” status.

So, let’s turn the process around and think first about what is going to get a donor into the envelope. Here are a few ideas from my mailbox.

A 'double whammy'

You know that big, blank backside of your envelope? Use it! Add a second teaser to increase your chances of capturing attention. Of the envelopes on my desk from the last week, more than half have huge, white (or Kraft) backs that are devoid of any compelling copy. There’s usually some printing (recycled paper logo, a mail code or return address), but nothing that gives me one last chance to reconsider and look inside. Adding a second teaser there costs nothing — and could get a potential donor to open the envelope.

Nothing
Yes, that’s right. An envelope that is addressed to the donor and has a live stamp (even the nonprofit stamp) appeals simply because of the unknown. The recipient thinks, “I don’t know who this is from, so I’ll take a few seconds to check it out.” Of course, your job then is to be sure you don’t disappoint — you must deliver with a great opening paragraph.

 
4

COMMENTS

Click here to leave a comment...
Comment *
Most Recent Comments:
Ron Goade - Posted on June 16, 2011
The minimal results come from using the same old, tried and no longer prudent direct mail pieces. The only way to succeed is to use a product that guarantee's inspection. Acclaim Mailer has mailed millions of laminated cards for various comanies, AARP as an example, that has produced results far better than any other type of media. The cost of the piece is directly portional to the response. Spend pennies and receive under 1%. Add an incentive and ensure the piece is read and the number escalate. Mailings by some of the higher end retailers, Ralph Lauren as an example ,have discovered the true cost is the ROI. Change to a unique piece that invites the reader to inspect the offer instead of spending dollars that are tossed before they are read.
David P Himes - Posted on June 16, 2011
Of course, everything should be tested. But in my experience most teaser copy should be removed. One should add teaser copy only when it is extremely compelling. In most cases, teaser copy screams "THIS LETTER IS TRYING TO SELL YOU SOMETHING." Thus, teaser copy is most likely, using Ms Barden's analogy, to be the last thing the recipient reads. The best envelope looks like a letter from your best friend. And the only thing I've ever received from a friend, which has teaser copy, said "photo enclosed" to keep the USPS from bending it.
Mike Cowart - Posted on June 16, 2011
Allegiant Direct has tested teaser vs. no teaser multiple times. The winner every time has been the "plain" envelope with a live nonprofit stamp! We have also tested barcodes in the address block of the letter vs. no barcode. The letter with no barcode wins even with a slight increase in postage.
Jim Brown - Posted on June 16, 2011
Printing on the back of the envelope is not always free. Small non-profits that only have budget enough for short print runs on stock envelopes will generally have to pay for the second press pass.
Click here to view archived comments...
Archived Comments:
Ron Goade - Posted on June 16, 2011
The minimal results come from using the same old, tried and no longer prudent direct mail pieces. The only way to succeed is to use a product that guarantee's inspection. Acclaim Mailer has mailed millions of laminated cards for various comanies, AARP as an example, that has produced results far better than any other type of media. The cost of the piece is directly portional to the response. Spend pennies and receive under 1%. Add an incentive and ensure the piece is read and the number escalate. Mailings by some of the higher end retailers, Ralph Lauren as an example ,have discovered the true cost is the ROI. Change to a unique piece that invites the reader to inspect the offer instead of spending dollars that are tossed before they are read.
David P Himes - Posted on June 16, 2011
Of course, everything should be tested. But in my experience most teaser copy should be removed. One should add teaser copy only when it is extremely compelling. In most cases, teaser copy screams "THIS LETTER IS TRYING TO SELL YOU SOMETHING." Thus, teaser copy is most likely, using Ms Barden's analogy, to be the last thing the recipient reads. The best envelope looks like a letter from your best friend. And the only thing I've ever received from a friend, which has teaser copy, said "photo enclosed" to keep the USPS from bending it.
Mike Cowart - Posted on June 16, 2011
Allegiant Direct has tested teaser vs. no teaser multiple times. The winner every time has been the "plain" envelope with a live nonprofit stamp! We have also tested barcodes in the address block of the letter vs. no barcode. The letter with no barcode wins even with a slight increase in postage.
Jim Brown - Posted on June 16, 2011
Printing on the back of the envelope is not always free. Small non-profits that only have budget enough for short print runs on stock envelopes will generally have to pay for the second press pass.